The proposal reflects statutory changes by the Working Families Tax Relief Act of 2004 (WFTRA) and the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act of 2008 (FCSIAA).
The IRS on Jan. 19 withdrew proposed regulations issued in 2000 that would have amended Section 1.152-2(c)(2) of the income tax regulations concerning the definition of an “authorized placement agency for a dependency exemption for a child placed for adoption under prior law.”
Those proposed regulations were withdrawn because the WFTRA amended Code Section 152 to provide that a child lawfully placed with a taxpayer for adoption can be claimed as a dependent.
Besides amendments to Section 152, the proposal also reflects statutory amendments to 26 CFR Part 1 under sections 2, 3, 21, 32, 63, 151, 6013, and to Part 301 under Section 6109 to reflect changes by the WFTRA and the FCSIAA. But the regulations also “address certain significant issues arising under these sections and modify certain IRS positions,” the proposal states.
Here’s a sample of some of the other issues regarding dependents in the 74-page proposal:
Dependency exemption. The definition of a dependent moves from Section 151 to 152.
Relationship test. The child isn’t a qualifying child of a person if he or she is not required to file an income tax return under Section 6012, and either doesn’t file an income tax return or files a return solely to claim a refund of estimated or withheld taxes.
Child adoption by someone other than the taxpayer. To fill what the IRS refers to as a “statutory gap,” the proposal applies to any child legally adopted by a “person,” or any child placed with a “person” for legal adoption is treated as a child by blood of that person to meet the relationship tests of sections 152(c)(2) and (d)(2). Likewise, a foster child is one placed with a “person” rather than a taxpayer.
Child placement. Regulations under Section 6109 would be amended to provide that the IRS assigns an adoption taxpayer identification number to a child who has been lawfully placed with a person for legal adoption.
Definition of authorized placement agency. An authorized agency that places children for legal adoption or in foster care may be a state; the District of Columbia; a possession of the United States; a foreign country; an agency or organization authorized by, or a political subdivision of, any of these entities; and an Indian tribal government or an agency or organization or political subdivision of that government.
Residency test-principal place of abode. This is a person’s main home or dwelling but doesn’t have to be the same physical location year-round, and can be temporary housing, such as a homeless shelter or relief housing after displacement by a natural disaster.
The proposal provides that a taxpayer and an individual have the same place of residence despite a temporary absence by either one. A nonpermanent failure to occupy the residence because of illness, education, business, vacation, military service, institutionalized care for a child who is permanently or totally disabled, or incarceration may be considered a temporary absence because of special circumstances.
An individual is considered having the same residence as the taxpayer for more than half of the tax year if the individual lives with the taxpayer for at least 183 nights during the taxable year or for 184 nights during a leap year.
Age test. The proposal provides that the term “student” is an individual who is a full-time student for at least five calendar months of the taxpayer’s tax year.
Support tests. In general, the amount of support from all sources includes support that the individual provides and income excludable from gross income.
Citizenship. The proposal provides that an adopted child of a taxpayer who is a US citizen or national may qualify as a dependent if, for the taxpayer’s taxable year, the child lives with the taxpayer and otherwise qualifies as a dependent.
IRS Says 2017 Tax Filing Season Opened Successfully & On Schedule
It's the first day of the 2017 tax season. The Internal Revenue Service (IRS) is now accepting and processing 2016 federal individual income tax returns - and so far, according to IRS, they're on schedule.
"Following months of hard work, we successfully opened our processing systems today to start this year’s tax season," said IRS Commissioner John Koskinen. "Getting to this point is a year-round effort for the IRS and the nation’s tax community. The dedicated employees of the IRS look forward to serving taxpayers this filing season, and I want to thank all of the tax and payroll community for their hard work that makes tax time smoother for the nation."
That doesn't mean that refunds are necessarily in the mail. Some tax refunds will be delayed. Last year, Congress passed a law which requires the IRS to hold refunds tied to the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and the Additional Child Tax Credit (ACTC) until February 15. The hold allows IRS to match information from forms W-2 and 1099 with information reported on tax returns; in prior years, refunds could be issued before forms were matched which increased the likelihood of fraud. The hold, together with bank processing times and bank holidays, means that taxpayers should not count on seeing those tax refunds until the week of February 27.
The IRS expects more than 70% of taxpayers to receive tax refunds this year. Last year, 111 million refunds were issued, with an average refund of $2,860. The IRS believes the numbers for 2017 will be similar.
Like last year, the IRS anticipates issuing more than nine out of 10 refunds in less than 21 days. However, with additional levels of review aimed at reducing tax-related identity theft and refund fraud, there could be individual delays.
What about state income tax returns? Remember that those timelines may differ from the IRS timeline and there may be additional requirements or reviews this year to try and reduce instances of fraud.
Some of these changes will be invisible (or nearly invisible) to taxpayers but will help the IRS, states and the tax industry provide new protections for taxpayers.